When it comes to employee wellness programs, a common concern often surfaces: low participation. Traditional wellness models lead to skepticism because employees rarely engage, leaving the program’s value untapped. However, at GoPivot, we’ve noticed a fascinating shift when we introduce our ‘Bill Upon Engagement’ model. The conversation transforms from concerns about low participation to apprehensions about high participation. This irony highlights a crucial insight into the effectiveness of wellness programs and the inherent flaws in traditional models.
The Traditional Model: Participation Challenges and Skepticism
Traditional wellness programs typically follow a Per Employee Per Month (PEPM) pricing model. Companies pay a flat rate for each employee, regardless of whether they engage with the program. This model often results in variable participation rates because employees may not find enough motivation or relevance in the program offerings. As a result, the program’s value remains largely theoretical, with limited impact on employee well-being or company culture.
These variable participation rates perpetuate a cycle of skepticism. Employers doubt the efficacy of wellness programs, viewing them as a checkbox rather than a valuable investment. This skepticism is well-founded when engagement is inconsistent and the benefits are hard to quantify.
GoPivot’s Model: Engagement and Real Results
Enter GoPivot’s Bill Upon Engagement (BUE) model. Our approach ties costs directly to actual engagement and activity levels. Instead of paying a flat rate for every employee, companies pay only for those who actively participate and achieve milestones in the program. This model creates a direct incentive for employees to engage, as their efforts are immediately rewarded.
The effectiveness of the BUE model is evident. Employees are more motivated to participate because they see tangible rewards for their efforts. As participation increases, the benefits of the wellness program become clear: improved employee health, enhanced morale, and a more positive company culture.
The Irony: From Low Participation to Engagement Anxiety
Here’s where the irony comes in. With traditional wellness programs, the main concern is that employees won’t participate. Yet, when we present GoPivot’s model, the concern flips to worry about overwhelming participation. This shift highlights the core issue: traditional wellness programs often struggle to sustain engagement, while our model is so effective that it flips the concern entirely.
This transformation from low engagement to potential over-engagement is not just ironic—it’s a testament to the power of a well-designed incentive system. It underscores the importance of creating programs that truly engage employees and provide real value, both to the participants and the organization.
Addressing the New Challenge
While high participation is a positive outcome, it does bring new considerations. Companies may worry about managing increased activity and ensuring that the rewards system remains sustainable. At GoPivot, we help organizations navigate these challenges by offering scalable solutions and robust reporting tools. Our goal is to ensure that high engagement translates into sustained employee well-being and organizational success.
Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Wellness Programs
The shift from concerns about low participation to fears of too much engagement is a powerful indicator of the effectiveness of GoPivot’s ‘Bill Upon Engagement’ model. It reveals the fundamental flaw in traditional wellness programs and highlights the need for innovative approaches that truly motivate employees.
At GoPivot, we’re proud to offer a solution that not only engages employees but also delivers measurable results. By aligning incentives with participation, we create a win-win scenario where both employees and employers benefit.
In the end, the irony we encounter serves as a reminder that effective wellness programs require more than just access—they need to inspire action. And when they do, the results can be transformative.